www.hiway-play.com/an-essential-a-to-z-on-pickin... - Details
malikosml: In 2015, JPM reduced its estimated G-SIB surcharge by 100 bps, to 3.5%, given a decline in non-operating deposits, a reduction in level 3 assets, and a decline in notional derivative amounts. Fitch views this meaningful reduction favorably,...
to tags: null
Save this page to your bookmarks.
In 2015, JPM reduced its estimated G-SIB surcharge by 100 bps, to 3.5%, given a decline in non-operating deposits, a reduction in level 3 assets, and a decline in notional derivative amounts. Fitch views this meaningful reduction favorably, as it puts the firm on more equal footing with http://www.bridgingandcommercial.co.uk/article-desc-11285_asset-manager-targets-bridging-market-through-correspondent-lending-programme the peer group. According to management, further reductions in the surcharge could have a significant client and franchise impact, thus, the trade-off with profitability will be carefully balanced over time. Fitch believes JPM is well positioned to maintain compliance with Basel III capital requirements, given the superior earnings capacity of the bank. In June 2016, JPM was informed that the Federal Reserve Board did not object to its 2016-17 capital plan. Results from the 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) showed a minimum CET1 ratio of 6.8% for the
In 2015, JPM reduced its estimated G-SIB surcharge by 100 bps, to 3.5%, given a decline in non-operating deposits, a reduction in level 3 assets, and a decline in notional derivative amounts. Fitch views this meaningful reduction favorably, as it puts the firm on more equal footing with http://www.bridgingandcommercial.co.uk/article-desc-11285_asset-manager-targets-bridging-market-through-correspondent-lending-programme the peer group. According to management, further reductions in the surcharge could have a significant client and franchise impact, thus, the trade-off with profitability will be carefully balanced over time. Fitch believes JPM is well positioned to maintain compliance with Basel III capital requirements, given the superior earnings capacity of the bank. In June 2016, JPM was informed that the Federal Reserve Board did not object to its 2016-17 capital plan. Results from the 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) showed a minimum CET1 ratio of 6.8% for the
This URL was also folkd by: