10/16/2013 02:07am - via http://bit.ly/1aM6uWP... - Details
moon9herrand: <p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart...
Save this page to your bookmarks.
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
<p>Legal provisions cannot be circumvented by acceleration clauses in employment contracts.</p><p>GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: The Federal Labour Court (BAG) ruled in its judgment (Az.: 8 AZR 280/12) that an acceleration clause incorporated by the parties into the employment contract only encompasses those cases which are not already regulated by law. Liability for intentional wrongdoing is therefore not covered by a clause of this kind.<br /><br />The parties had agreed in an employment contract that claims from and in connection with the employment agreement could only be enforced in writing and within three months from their maturity. If enforcement does not take place within the agreed timeframe, the claims should thus lapse.<br /><br />Due to long-term illness and inability to work on the part of the claimant, both parties
This URL was also folkd by: