Page details
First discovered on:
02:01am, 12/29/09

All tags for this page:
0%
10 folks

Outcomes using exhaled nitric oxide measurements as an adjunct to primary care asthma management

bx.businessweek.com/health-20/view?url=http%3A%2... - Details

danisaxon: FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but...

to tags:                   ...

Save this page to your bookmarks.

Tagged and described by the following users:

matttdav saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:01am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

lukemattt saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:03am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

ryanmattias saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:04am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

gracemareena saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:05am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

danisaxon saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:06am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

miajaccob saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:07am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

davhunter1 saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:08am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

sarajone8 saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:09am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

ericmattt saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:09am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

zoesera saved and folkd this page on 12/29/2009 02:10am

FENO was measured according to current guidelines using a NIOX MINO electrochemical analyzer or a NIOX chemiluminescence analyzer (both Aerocrine, Solna, Sweden). The latter was available at the Research Unit, 5km. from the Health Centre, but was used only when there was technical failure of the NIOX MINO. It seems that the NIOX MINO Analyzer had frequent technical failures and significant sensor inaccuracy issues causing the researcher to apply a manual correction factor and/or rely on the expensive NIOX lab instrument as a backup.

This URL was also folkd by:

by matttdav, by lukemattt, by ryanmattias, by gracemareena, by danisaxon, by miajaccob, by davhunter1, by sarajone8, by ericmattt, by zoesera